This one I agree with. Very funny, but funny because it reflects truth.
The second is a post on open source computing. I completely disagree with the concept that open source can keep up with closed source in terms of innovation (Anne Zelenka makes a great argument here), and that closed source is bad for ducks (see Simon's post).
However, I do believe that standardization spreads faster with open source than with closed source. For what its worth, I would also like to see a major utility computing platform release its technology to open source. (Well, at least the components that are required for portability.) I just wonder why any of them would without pressure from the market.
My equations would reflect the "Schrodinger's Cat" aspects of closed source products prior to the introduction of accepted standards,
open source == kindness to ducks
closed source == ambivolence towards ducks; could go either way